Advertisement
Case Reports|Articles in Press

Proximal and distal right bundle branch pacing: insights into conduction system physiology

Open AccessPublished:March 14, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.03.005

      Keywords

      Introduction

      Conduction system pacing (CSP) is progressively gaining mainstream practise for offering a more physiological form of antibradycardia pacing compared to right ventricular (RV) pacing, as well as an alternative to biventricular pacing for treating heart failure. CSP usually involves His bundle pacing or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Right bundle branch pacing (RBBP) has only been described to date in a case report.

      Burri H. Fortuitous right bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm Case Reports 2022;In press.

      We describe herein a patient in whom proximal as well as distal RBBP was observed. Evidence of rapid left ventricular activation by pacing of the RV septum is also discussed.

      Case report

      A 71-year old patient with chronic atrial fibrillation with symptomatic brady-tachy syndrome was scheduled for single-chamber pacemaker implantation with LBBAP in anticipation for possible future atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation. Baseline QRS morphology was normal with 93 ms duration. Conduction system pacing (CSP) procedures are all filmed at our institution with simultaneous recordings of fluoroscopy, electrophysiology bay tracings, pacing system analyzer screen and video of the operation field, allowing precise reconstitution of the entire procedure. After having identified the tricuspid annulus by electrogram (EGM) analysis (with presence of atrial and ventricular potentials), proximal LBBAP was initially attempted, using a Solia 60 cm lead and a Selectra 55 guiding catheter (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). The lead was positioned below the annulus at about 10 mm towards the apex in the right anterior oblique (RAO) view (figure 1A). Traumatic right bundle branch block (RBBB) resulted from positioning the guiding catheter. After deploying the helix, a fragmented potential of negative polarity of 21 ms duration, and with a potential – QRS delay of 32 ms was visualized (figure 1C). Pacing resulted in a narrow QRS, suggestive of HBP. Threshold testing showed a transition at 0.6 V / 0.5 ms from narrow QRS morphology to a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology, indicating right bundle branch pacing (RBBP) distal to the site of block (figure 1B). As it was considered that future AVN ablation could be possibile and in order to avoid compromising lead function,
      • Zweerink A
      • Bakelants E
      • Stettler C
      • Burri H
      Cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node in patients with His-bundle pacing.
      a more distal lead position was sought after. The lead was unscrewed and positioned 20 mm in an apical and inferior direction (figure 2A). There was no pre-systolic potential visible at this site. Pace-mapping at this spot (before screwing of the lead) unexpectedly revealed a relatively narrow QRS with a Qr pattern in V1 (figure 2B). The lead was then fixated with a few rotations of the lead body. Paced QRS morphology in V1 showed a QR pattern, with an R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V6 of 65 ms (figure 2B). Capture threshold was 1.2 V / 0.5 ms. Upon retrospective review of the tracing, there had been a slight transition in QRS morphology in the inferior leads when the output had been reduced directly from 5V to 2 V / 0.5 ms (figure 2B and 2C), which was reproduced two more times during repeated testing but had initially gone unnoticed. Sensing from the anode did not show any current of injury, confirming superficial lead depth. Due to a rise in threshold to 1.7 V / 0.5 ms, a few additional lead rotations were given, with an R pattern in V1 and V6RWPT shortening to 62 ms. Capture threshold rose to 2V / 0.5 ms and then fell to 1.4 V / 0.5 ms over the next minutes, following which the lead was left in this position. A transthoracic echocardiogram was later performed and showed that the final lead position was at the left septal subendocardium, 21 mm from the insertion of the tricuspid septal leaflet. The thickness of the interventricular septum was only 7 mm at this site (see figure 3).
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Findings with lead position at the proximal pacing site. A. Right anterior oblique (RAO) fluoroscopic view. B. Transition in paced QRS morphology with decrementing pacing output. Note traumatic right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology of the intrinsic QRS observed after lead fixation. C. ECG morphology, endocardial signals and RWPT (measured from the potential in intrinsic rhythm or from the pacing spike). QRS is normal at baseline (ECG displayed at 25 mm/s). Following lead fixation, RBBB is observed (tracing displayed at 100 mm/s) with visualization of a right bundle branch potential (delay to QRS onset of 32 ms, with fragmentation probably resulting from injury). A relatively narrow QRS results from conduction tissue capture proximal and distal to the site of RBBB with anterograde (antero) and retrograde (retro) conduction. Capture is selective (S-RBBP) - note the split signal on the filtered conduction system pacing (CSP F) channel. At lower output (0.6 V), selective capture distally to the site of block results in left bundle branch block QRS morphology and wide splitting of the signal on the CSP F electrogram. D. Schematic representation of hypothetical activation with proximal RBBP. During intrinsic conduction, potential to QRS interval is short due to simultaneous conduction down the right bundle (purple arrow) and the left bundle (green arrows) with early activation of the left septum. With RBBP and bidirectional propagation (proximal as well as distal to the conduction block), V6RWPT is longer than the potential to QRS interval due to the sequential retrograde conduction via the right bundle and anterograde conduction down the left bundle. The ventricular potential on the CSP F channel is early due to transeptal propagation. At low output with loss of capture proximal to the site of block, V6RWPT prolongs significantly due to left ventricular activation occurring via myocardial propagation only (depicted by the red arrow). The signal in the CSP F channel splits significantly as local myocardial activation now occurs by propagation from apex to base (rather than transeptally). Filter settings: CSP UF 0.5-300 Hz; CSP F 30-300 Hz. Other abbreviations as in text.
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Findings with lead position at the distal pacing site. A. Lead position in the RAO view. B. After screwing the lead superficially, slight transition in QRS morphology was observed at decrementing pacing output (visible in the inferior leads). Note recovery of traumatic RBBB and resumption of baseline morphology of the intrinsic QRS. C. ECG morphology, endocardial signals and RWPT. First panel: QRS obtained with pacemapping of the right ventricular septum (before screwing the lead) with an unexpectedly short V6RWPT and a qr pattern in V1. Morphology with pacemapping was similar in the peripheral leads to that obtained after superficial lead insertion (second panel) and non-selective distal RBBP (NS-RBBP dist), with slight differences in the precordial leads (indicating earlier left ventricular activation after lead fixation within the septum). With decrementing output, myocardial capture only was obtained (RBBP-dist Myo, third panel). After additional rotations of the lead, left ventricular septal pacing (LBBAP) was obtained (fourth panel), with change in QRS morphology and absence of QRS transitions with decrementing output. D. Schematic representation of hypothetical activation during pacemapping/distal RBBP and LBBAP. Left panel: during pacemapping and after superficial lead insertion at high output, RBBB and local myocardial capture are obtained, with transseptal retrograde activation of Purkinje fibres, resulting in left to right septal activation (explaining the QR/R pattern in V1 and short V6RWPT) but with a short V6-V1 interpeak interval due to early right ventricular activation. At decrementing output after superficial lead insertion (middle panel), there is loss of RBB capture. V6RWPTs are identical during NS-RBBP and Myo RBBP. With deeper lead insertion (right panel), distal RBBP is lost and LBBAP results in a slightly shorter V6RWPT due to greater proximity of the lead to the Purkinje fibres, with prolongation of V1RWPT due to delayed right ventricular activation. Other abbreviations as in text and filter settings as in .
      Figure thumbnail gr3
      Figure 3Left panel: Echocardiogram in the apical 4-chamber view showing left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) lead position. Right panel: Zoom showing lead tip in the left ventricular septal subendocardium, with insertion near the base of the moderator band (MB), 21 mm from the septal leaflet of the tricuspid valve (TV). Thickness of the interventricular septum was only 7 mm. RV = right ventricle; LV = left ventricle; RA = right atrium.

      Discussion

      Based upon analysis of lead position on fluoroscopy, intrinsic signals, paced QRS morphology at different outputs and measurements of timing of RWPT in V1 and in V6 (as surrogates for anterior right ventricular and lateral left ventricular activation respectively), the following deductions may be made:
      • 1.
        The initial lead position was on the proximal right bundle branch (RBB). The potential to QRS duration of 32 ms is in keeping with this hypothesis, which was later confirmed by selective RBBP with retrograde block and a typical LBBB morphology at low output. This was due to capture of conduction tissue distal to the site of traumatic RBBB. At higher output, the conduction tissue proximal to the block was also captured, narrowing the QRS.
      • 2.
        The lead had been repositioned on a more distal branch of the RBB, as indicated by the slight transition in QRS morphology with decrementing unipolar output, which is the hallmark of conduction tissue capture. Loss of RBB capture had however no impact on left ventricular activation, as indicated by unchanged V6RWPT, which was surprisingly short.
      • 3.
        Left-sided conduction system capture seemed to be present at the site of the distal RBBP, already during pace-mapping of the endocardial surface (before screwing in the lead).
      • 4.
        After a deeper lead position had been obtained, RBBP was lost, as indicated by lack of QRS transitions with decrementing output. The end result was LBBAP.
      Our findings provide strong evidence for proximal and distal RBBP as indicated by the transitions in QRS morphology with decrementing pacing output at the two sites. QRS morphology with proximal RBBP resembles that of HBP, but differs from the intrinsic QRS due to the slightly modified ventricular activation sequence,
      • Burri H
      • Jastrzebski M
      • Vijayaraman P
      Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow-Up.
      and can be distinguished by a stimulus-V6RWPT which is significantly longer than the potential-V6RWPT (instead of being identical,
      • Burri H
      • Jastrzebski M
      • Vijayaraman P
      Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow-Up.
      see figure 1D for explanation).

      Jastrzębski M, Kiełbasa G, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Rajzer M, Curila K, Burri H, Vijayaraman P. Right bundle branch pacing: Criteria, characteristics, and outcomes. Heart Rhythm Jan 23 2023.

      Distal RBBP from a right ventricular septal lead has only recently been described in another case report.

      Burri H. Fortuitous right bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm Case Reports 2022;In press.

      Due to the very minor changes in QRS morphology with distal RBB capture compared to pure myocardial capture at the same pacing site (and no difference in the precordial leads) it seems unlikely that distal RBB capture has any meaningful clinical benefit.
      Another novel observation was the Qr morphology in V1 and V6RWPT of 68 ms during pacemapping of the right-sided septal endocardium. We have previously found V6RWPT < 75 ms to be 100% specific for left-sided conduction system capture.
      • Jastrzębski M
      • Burri H
      • Kiełbasa G
      • Curila K
      • Moskal P
      • Bednarek A
      • Rajzer M
      • Vijayaraman P
      The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.
      The short V6RWPT could not have resulted from conduction by transeptal fibres from the RBB, as V6RWPT was long (107 ms) during selective proximal RBBP in the presence of RBBB with retrograde block (see figure 1C). Our hypothesis is that septal myocardial capture at this location was shortly followed by secondary retrograde activation of left-sided conduction tissue. Although intra-mural Purkinje fibres have never been identified in human hearts, either histologically
      • Sedmera D
      • Gourdie RG
      Why do we have Purkinje fibers deep in our heart?.
      ,
      • Massing GK
      • James TN
      Anatomical configuration of the His bundle and bundle branches in the human heart.
      or by micro-CT,
      • Stephenson RS
      • Atkinson A
      • Kottas P
      • Perde F
      • Jafarzadeh F
      • Bateman M
      • Iaizzo PA
      • Zhao J
      • Zhang H
      • Anderson RH
      • Jarvis JC
      • Dobrzynski H
      High resolution 3-Dimensional imaging of the human cardiac conduction system from microanatomy to mathematical modeling.
      it is acknowledged that terminal fibres may be under-recognized by the former technique due to its destructive nature, and by the latter by loss of fibrous sheaths.
      • Stephenson RS
      • Atkinson A
      • Kottas P
      • Perde F
      • Jafarzadeh F
      • Bateman M
      • Iaizzo PA
      • Zhao J
      • Zhang H
      • Anderson RH
      • Jarvis JC
      • Dobrzynski H
      High resolution 3-Dimensional imaging of the human cardiac conduction system from microanatomy to mathematical modeling.
      In the IMAGE-LBBP study evaluating LBBP lead depth by CT, fascicular potentials were visualized when the lead tip was within the thickness of the septum, > 4 mm from the LV blood pool, with QRS morphology compatible with LBBP, thus suggesting existence of penetrating conduction fibers.
      • Chen K
      • Liu X
      • Hou X
      • et al.
      Computed tomography imaging-identified location and electrocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients.
      Another explanation could be that the relatively thin septum of our patient at the lead insertion site (7 mm) explained the findings. Durrer et al.
      • Durrer D
      • van Dam RT
      • Freud GE
      • Janse MJ
      • Meijler FL
      • Arzbaecher RC
      Total excitation of the isolated human heart.
      have shown that septal activation usually proceeds from left to right, and that transeptal conduction velocity of stimulation impulses from right to left was on average 43.4 cm/s, with a conduction velocity of Purkinje fibres in the order of 2 m/s. Transseptal myocardial activation from the right ventricular septum over 5-10 mm would reach the subendocardial left-sided Purkinje network within 10-20 ms. Activation of the left septal Purkinje network may then result in left-to-right septal activation, with a QR morphology in V1. Wavefront propagation to the left ventricular free wall over approximately 10 cm of Purkinje network would require an additional 50 ms, resulting in a V6RWPT of ∼ 60-70 ms, which was within the range of our observations. However, it remains unexplained why right ventricular septal pacing does not result in this ECG pattern more often. Nevertheless, it is of interest that a relatively physiological QRS may result from right-sided septal pacing, which may open a new avenue for CSP.

      References

      1. Burri H. Fortuitous right bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm Case Reports 2022;In press.

        • Zweerink A
        • Bakelants E
        • Stettler C
        • Burri H
        Cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node in patients with His-bundle pacing.
        Europace Mar 8. 2021; 23: 421-430
        • Burri H
        • Jastrzebski M
        • Vijayaraman P
        Electrocardiographic Analysis for His Bundle Pacing at Implantation and Follow-Up.
        JACC Clin Electrophysiol Jul. 2020; 6: 883-900
      2. Jastrzębski M, Kiełbasa G, Moskal P, Bednarek A, Rajzer M, Curila K, Burri H, Vijayaraman P. Right bundle branch pacing: Criteria, characteristics, and outcomes. Heart Rhythm Jan 23 2023.

        • Jastrzębski M
        • Burri H
        • Kiełbasa G
        • Curila K
        • Moskal P
        • Bednarek A
        • Rajzer M
        • Vijayaraman P
        The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.
        Europace Jan 4. 2022; 24: 40-47
        • Sedmera D
        • Gourdie RG
        Why do we have Purkinje fibers deep in our heart?.
        Physiological research. 2014; 63: S9-18
        • Massing GK
        • James TN
        Anatomical configuration of the His bundle and bundle branches in the human heart.
        Circulation Apr. 1976; 53: 609-621
        • Stephenson RS
        • Atkinson A
        • Kottas P
        • Perde F
        • Jafarzadeh F
        • Bateman M
        • Iaizzo PA
        • Zhao J
        • Zhang H
        • Anderson RH
        • Jarvis JC
        • Dobrzynski H
        High resolution 3-Dimensional imaging of the human cardiac conduction system from microanatomy to mathematical modeling.
        Scientific Reports. 2017/08/03 2017; 7: 7188
        • Chen K
        • Liu X
        • Hou X
        • et al.
        Computed tomography imaging-identified location and electrocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients.
        J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Jun. 2022; 33: 1244-1254
        • Durrer D
        • van Dam RT
        • Freud GE
        • Janse MJ
        • Meijler FL
        • Arzbaecher RC
        Total excitation of the isolated human heart.
        Circulation Jun. 1970; 41: 899-912